![take s snap shot premier pro cs4 take s snap shot premier pro cs4](https://s.yimg.com/uu/api/res/1.2/E9oG0tYhZxB7E5ObNJFNoQ--~B/Zmk9c3RyaW07aD02MjQ7cT04MDt3PTEyMDA7YXBwaWQ9eXRhY2h5b24-/https://s.yimg.com/hd/cp-video-transcode/prod/2021-11/18/6195ad2178856f2b41c1ed6b/6195ad2178856f2b41c1ed6c_o_U_v2.jpg)
![take s snap shot premier pro cs4 take s snap shot premier pro cs4](https://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/images1000x1000/Adobe_65108023_Premiere_Pro_CS5_5_For_832895.jpg)
#Take s snap shot premier pro cs4 mac
Literally a day after I got it up and running, Apple announced the new Nehalem-EP based Mac Pro. I couldn’t wait any longer and I ended up building a Hackintosh based on Intel’s Core i7. Core i7 launched last November and it was now mid-March with no Nehalem based Macs. While Nehalem was originally supposed to have a simultaneous desktop and server/workstation release, the Xeon parts got pushed back due to OEM validation delays from what I heard. Of course Nehalem-EP is sold under the Xeon brand the product names and specs are as follows: CPU Nehalem-EP even uses the same socket as Intel’s Core i7: LGA-1366, implying that Intel artificially restricts its desktop Core i7s to operate in single-socket mode only. Nehalem-EP can thus be used in dual-socket motherboards.
![take s snap shot premier pro cs4 take s snap shot premier pro cs4](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PvNo88Jyu-o/maxresdefault.jpg)
The other major change between Nehalem-EP and Core i7 is that each Nehalem-EP processor has two QPI links instead of one. Getting back to reality, we have the Nehalem-EP processor: effectively a server-version of Core i7. Apple could put two of those on a motherboard and have a 16-core, 32-thread monster that would probably cost over $8,000.
![take s snap shot premier pro cs4 take s snap shot premier pro cs4](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/O638JhevTGU/hqdefault.jpg)
At the high end there’s the Nehalem-EX, that’s 8 cores on a single die. In order to justify the price point of the Mac Pro, it must use Xeons. Then reality set in: Apple wouldn’t put a Core i7 in the Mac Pro because Dell can do the same in a system for under $900. Surely Apple wouldn’t wait and make a Xeon version, after all why would you need two processors? A single Core i7 can work on eight threads at the same time - most users have a tough time stressing four. I found myself waiting for Apple to do the right thing and release a Mac based on the Core i7. Steve didn’t need another Benz that badly. My desktop tests showed that Penryn generally yielded a 0 - 10% performance increase over Conroe and I wasn’t about to spend $3K for 10%.
#Take s snap shot premier pro cs4 upgrade
I stayed away from the Harpertown upgrade simply because it was a lot of money for a moderate increase in performance. While you could stick Clovertown into the first generation Mac Pros, you couldn’t upgrade them to Harpertown without hardware modifications to the system (don’t ask me what they are :).). That was then, this is now.Īpple released a newer Mac Pro with quad-core Clovertown parts (65nm Kentsfield equivalent), then once more with Harpertown (45nm Penryn equivalent). You’ll remember that I was quite happy with Conroe when it launched in 2006, so by extension I was quite happy with my Mac Pro. Woodcrest was the server version of Conroe, the heart of the original Core 2 Duo. In it are the same two 3.0GHz dual-core Woodcrest based Xeons that I upgraded it with for part 3 of my Mac Pro coverage. It may look modern, but this is actually the same Mac Pro I reviewed back in 2006. The processor itself isn’t overly expensive, it’s the motherboard that really puts it over the top but if you have the means, I highly recommend picking one up. In the months since that review went live I’ve had the benefit of using the i7 a lot. Sure, it was fast, but it wasn’t that much faster than a speedy Core 2 Quad. If you read my review of the i7 you may have left the review feeling slightly underwhelmed by the processor. Both our SSD and GPU testbeds use Intel’s new Core i7 processor. In my line of work, I tend to get access to a lot of very fast hardware.